![linux truecrypt alternative linux truecrypt alternative](https://www.maketecheasier.com/assets/uploads/2014/07/TrueCrypt-alternatives-diskcryptor.png)
So you'd think Amazon wouldn't mess around, and maybe at some conference they sent a rep to, he'd get to comparing notes and Google sez "Hey, your output in your test case is different from mine. But I'd think you ran the same process twice in exactly the same way (maybe even including timestamps), you're get the *same* gobledy gook, right? I guess what's confusing me is to my knowledge encryption is "just an algorithm" so I'd think if you took "Iain B rulez!" it might spit out weflhjegehwgewig or whatever. Others more cynical than I might suggest that, if the TrueCrypt takedown was the result of being nobbled by the NSA (e.g., like the two encrypted email services over the last 12 months), then the TrueCrypt developers may have been left little option but to shut down, rather than be obliged to leave TrueCrypt fitted full of NSA backdoors like Symantec and Microsoft encryption have been rumoured to be.Īnother fascinating comment. The best alternative to TrueCrypt could yet well be TrueCrypt. That alone could spell more for TrueCrypt's longevity than any recent unexplained closure of the TrueCrypt website. That mandate would presumably have been made for solid business reasons, and they would not have entered into it lightly. Presumably it was not for nothing that Amazon Web Services some time back mandated the use of only TrueCrypt for its encryption, if you wanted to use their secure storage services. I would like to see a report on the still-ongoing project to audit TrueCrypt (which project website apparently also holds a full copy of all the software and code) before pronouncing it as "dead".
![linux truecrypt alternative linux truecrypt alternative](https://www.linuxandubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/choose-volume-format-FAT-NTFS-etc.jpg)
With closed source, you don't even get the option.
![linux truecrypt alternative linux truecrypt alternative](https://www.fossmint.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/veracypt-drive-password-prompt-1140x641.png)
closed source plays into this very much, except that with open source you at least have the possibility of self-supporting (even if it would be a lot of effort) if the vendor goes away. There's even the occasional complaint I come across about VB6.Īgain, I don't think open source vs. Note that I still read about complaints regarding XP being unsupported. However, even if given a lot of notice many people can still be unhappy. While they do abandon software, it seems that generally they give a fair bit of notice. I think that Microsoft actually comes out looking pretty good in this area. Fortunately, I was able to move on by exporting my local data and getting it read into another password wallet program without too much trouble.
![linux truecrypt alternative linux truecrypt alternative](https://www.linuxandubuntu.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/VeraCrypt-enter-password-to-mount-encrypted-volume.jpg)
The SafeWallet software is no longer supported, and the servers used to sync the data across devices stopped working. Other than the huge software vendors like MS, Google, Adobe, Symantec, I think this is a similar level of knowledge that most people have about their software vendors. They had a website, they offered software for purchase, and they accepted credit cards for payment. Which is to say, I didn't know much of anything about them. The vendor was as well known or well established as many software vendors I've purchased from. I know that many people were upset by it being shutdown.Ī much smaller, but personal, example: I used to use some software called SafeWallet by SBSH, and I had paid the couple dollars for it. While not a paid product, Google Reader was offered by a well-known entity. I still don't think that purchasing software or having software provided by a well-known entity provides any better trustworthiness. It also works fine with black & white pix. It will work on Windows, Linux and Mac OS because it is written in Java and thus platform independent." "The Digital Invisible Ink Toolkit ((DIIT)) is a Java steganography tool that can hide any sort of file inside a digital image (regarding that the message will fit, and the image is 24 bit colour). It includes plausible deniability, but is rather limited in file size capacity.Īlso it is rather involved to work with because the GUI does not allow drag & drop. This is its pretty and brainy creator, Dr. Scramdisk is freeware and rather robust, with plausible deniability, but does have the above limitations.Īnother interesting alternative is freeware DIIT. Or if you can dual-boot to an older OS like Win98, Scramdisk works within that OS. There may be a Scramdisk for Linux, but the reports are several years old and I'm not sure if it's compatible with any current Linux OS, and I would appreciate anyone cluing me in on that question. AFAIC TrueCrypt is not 'dead' v.7.1a works fine, and so does AxCrypt (which BTW includes a nice file shredder feature).